Can I teach readers how to buy a stock, in eight paragraphs, really? No. But I can briefly describe what I look for in selecting stocks for our portfolios. It’s not the only way to buy stocks, but it’s what we do.
We are looking for “undervalued” stocks – but who isn’t? For us, a stock’s intrinsic value is based on its demonstrated earnings power. We are likely to miss high potential companies that aren’t projected to make money anytime soon, but have the potential to be great. My boys and I stopped by the Tesla Motors gallery in Boulder when it opened in 2009. Tesla makes beautiful cars with exciting technology. It might be a wonderful investment. However, to pick a stock, first I want to be able to put a number on its intrinsic value. Without current earnings, it is tough for this analyst to place a value on the business. To me, current earnings power is one thing that separates the speculative bets from more conservative investments.
Contrarian investors tend to buy stocks with low absolute Price/Earning ratios. I cut my teeth in a contrarian shop. In today’s market, for example, Merck sells at about 8-times its projected earnings power. The inverse of the P/E ratio is the Earnings Yield. For Merck, it’s nearly 12.5%, quite a bit higher than what banks are paying depositors. Merck only pays out a portion of its earnings to stockholders in a dividend. The annual dividend yield is 4.7%, still better than a bank account, but well below the company’s earnings yield.
In the late-1990’s I converted from a deep value contratian to “Relative P/E” investing. Instead of being limited only to stocks with the absolute lowest P/E ratios, relative P/E investors value a stock relative to where it normally trades. This takes a bit of research to determine what the normal P/E ratio is for a particular stock or industry, but it opens the portfolio up to faster growing stocks. A technology company that normally sells at 20-times earnings but is now selling at only 10-times earnings might be a much better bargain than a slow-growing utility company that is currently priced at a lower absolute P/E ratio of 9, but has a normal P/E ratio of 10-times.
A return to a normal P/E ratio takes time, of course. How long it takes is a key variable. An untimely stock might take five years to right itself and return to a more normal valuation. Stocks that are more timely might already be in the process of being revalued back to a more normal level. The quicker the stocks return to normal, the higher the investors’ rate of return. So after comparing the intrinsic value of a company (based on its normal P/E ratio) to the current price in order to estimate appreciation potential, investors should estimate how quickly stocks can reach target in order to calculate the annualized estimated rate of appreciation on each potential investment.
Finally, dividend yields do matter. Merck pays investors waiting for the stock to go up 4.7% per year. Tesla owners earn nothing. For each of the stocks in our portfolio, and for a set of potential purchase candidates that sit on our “watch list,” we have calculated the total expected return, which is the estimated annual capital appreciation plus the current dividend yield.
After that, portfolio construction takes on much more of a macroeconomic feel. Which industries have strong economic fundamentals and are likely to be timely investments? How much diversification outside of the U.S. stock market makes sense. Should investors reduce portfolio risk by putting bonds or cash into what is normally an all-stock portfolio? These asset allocation decisions are crucial, but once the macro characteristics of the portfolio have been determined, stock selection mostly boils down to picking the stocks in each sector that have the highest expected return.
The best thing about having a discipline (almost any discipline!) is that it reduces the impact that emotions play in investing. Interviewing management creates emotional bonds. Falling in love with cool products can lead to disaster. I love Boston Market restaurants, and have ever since I started taking my fiancĂ© to them for a cheap date in the early -1990’s. My devoted patronage didn’t stop the company from going bankrupt, however. But having a quantitative basis for buying a company, establishing a target price, calculating expected return, determining timeliness, and buying, selling or holding an investment takes out some of the emotion and can lead to better portfolio performance.
On April 5, May-Investments will host a workshop on "Relative P/E Investing" at our offices. Starting at noon, lunch will be served and Doug will spend the next 60 minutes talking about the stocks in the Timely & Undervalued individual stock portfolio, and how they were identified by the relative P/E methodology for inclusion in the portfolio. Workshop attendees might want to bring a company of their own if they want to see the method applied to a stock of particular interest.
Douglas B. May, CFA, is President of May-Investments, LLC and author of Investment Heresies .
Thursday, March 10, 2011
"Relative P/E Investing" April 5 Educational Workshop
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment